manny. i haven’t said anything about the manny thing until now because… well, i barely knew anything about the dude. all i knew was that he seemed “silly” (bad) and i wanted nothing to do with him.

but i’m pretty into it right now. i’m glad we got him for next to nothing. laroche, if you couldn’t already tell, i’m fine without. he and his brother can now revel together in being announced as “the laroche brothers.”

if they had traded away one of
my dudes i would’ve been livid. i probably would’ve deleted this blog and thrown out the cable
box. anyway, for what he’s contributing to the team he doesn’t seem so silly anymore. silly looking, maybe, yes.

the media sure got a little creepy with the whole “many mania”/”manny-wood”/”manny being manny” thing.

ethier.

wtf. i don’t want to play these teams!? cardinals (63-52)? phillies (61-51)?? brewers (63-51)?? while the d-backs sit pretty and play the pirates (51-62)? braves (52-61)? astros (54-58)?

finally. how ’bout andruw’s homer? that was weird!

and how are you gonna bring in johnson instead of kuo??????????????

WALK-OFF HOMER.

WHY.